California AB 2747 positive rent reporting took effect April 1, 2025, and it permanently changed how Roseville, Rocklin, and Sacramento landlords handle tenant credit data. If you own or manage 15 or more rental units in California, you are required by law to offer positive rent reporting to every new tenant at lease signing and to every existing tenant at least once a year. Skip that step and you are out of compliance with Civil Code Section 1954.07.
This is not optional. It is not a suggestion. And the rule catches far more landlords than most realize because the 15-unit threshold counts every unit you own across every property in California -- not just units inside a single building.
TL;DR: California AB 2747, codified at Civil Code Section 1954.07 (effective April 1, 2025), requires landlords owning 15 or more residential rental units in California to offer positive rent reporting to every tenant. Landlords must provide a written offer at lease signing and annually thereafter, allow tenants to opt in or out at any time, use a nationally recognized consumer reporting agency, cap any tenant-paid fee at the lesser of actual cost or $10 per month, report on-time payments only (not late payments), and maintain records for at least three years. Violations expose landlords to civil penalties and private rights of action. The rule applies to single-family rentals, duplexes, small multifamily, and large apartment properties once the 15-unit portfolio threshold is met (AB 2747 Bill Text; CAA Guidance).
What AB 2747 Requires in Plain English
Here is the rule, stripped of legal jargon. If you own 15 or more residential rental units anywhere in California, you must:
- Offer positive rent reporting to every tenant in writing at the start of each new tenancy
- Offer it again to every existing tenant at least once every 12 months
- Use a nationally recognized consumer reporting agency (the "big three" credit bureaus or an approved alternative)
- Cap any fee charged to the tenant at the lesser of your actual cost or $10 per month
- Report only on-time payments -- late payments are not reportable under this law
- Honor opt-out requests within 15 days and stop reporting immediately
- Maintain records of offers, opt-ins, opt-outs, and reporting activity for at least three years
The law is grounded in a simple policy idea: tenants who pay rent on time should be able to build credit from it. Roughly 90% of landlords historically did not report rent to credit bureaus, which meant renters got none of the credit-building benefit that homeowners get automatically from mortgage reporting. AB 2747 puts California at the front of the national push to close that gap.
Who Is Required to Comply (and Who Is Exempt)
The compliance trigger is the 15-unit threshold. Counting rules matter here because many landlords miscount and assume they are exempt when they are not.
How to Count Your 15 Units
Civil Code 1954.07 counts residential rental units held by the same owner anywhere in California. That includes:
- Single-family rental homes you own individually
- Units inside duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes
- Condos you rent out
- Units in larger apartment buildings
- ADUs and JADUs being rented separately (see our California ADU law guide)
- Units held through an LLC, partnership, or trust you control (see our rental property LLC guide)
A landlord with 8 single-family rentals in Roseville, 4 condos in Sacramento, and 3 duplex units in Rocklin owns 15 units total and is subject to AB 2747 -- even though no single property has more than a few units. That surprises a lot of owners. It is also why Lifetime Property Management's clients, many of whom own scattered-site portfolios, needed an AB 2747 compliance workflow in place the moment the law activated in 2025.
Statutory Exemptions
AB 2747 includes narrow exemptions. A landlord is not required to offer positive rent reporting if:
- The property has fewer than 15 units total across the owner's entire California portfolio
- The unit is part of a government subsidized housing program where rent reporting is already handled by the program administrator
- The tenancy is a subsidized housing tenancy where the state or federal regulator has specified different rent-reporting rules
Note what is not exempt: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher tenancies in private rentals. If you accept Section 8 at a single-family home and you own 15+ units total, AB 2747 still applies to that tenancy. Our California Section 8 landlord guide covers the intersection of voucher rules and AB 2747.
The Written Offer: What It Must Contain
The statute is specific about what the landlord's written offer of positive rent reporting must include. Missing any of these elements can create a technical violation even if the landlord otherwise tried to comply.
Each written offer must:
- Identify at least one nationally recognized consumer reporting agency the landlord will report to
- Disclose the cost charged to the tenant, if any, not to exceed the lesser of actual cost or $10 per month
- State that the offer is for reporting of on-time rent payments only
- Explain that the tenant has the right to opt in or opt out at any time
- Describe the procedure to opt in (typically a signed election form)
- Describe the procedure to opt out (written request to the landlord)
- State that opting out takes effect within 15 days of the request
Pro Tip: Build your AB 2747 offer directly into your lease addendum package. Every new California lease agreement you sign should include the offer as a standalone addendum the tenant initials separately. This creates a clear paper trail that the offer was made at lease commencement, not after the fact.
Approved Credit Bureaus and Reporting Channels
AB 2747 requires landlords to report to a "nationally recognized consumer reporting agency." In practice, that means one of the three major credit bureaus or an approved third-party aggregator that feeds data to them.
The Three Major Consumer Reporting Agencies
- Experian -- accepts rent data through RentBureau and other approved aggregators
- Equifax -- accepts rent data through multiple approved data furnishers
- TransUnion -- accepts rent data through ResidentCredit and approved aggregators
Most landlords do not report directly to the bureaus. Direct reporting requires technical integration, Metro 2 formatted data files, and data furnisher status under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Almost all AB 2747 compliance happens through third-party rent reporting services that aggregate landlord data and push it to the bureaus on the landlord's behalf.
Common Third-Party Rent Reporting Services
Popular compliant vendors used by California property managers include Experian RentBureau, Esusu, LevelCredit, Rental Kharma, RentReporters, and reporting features built into property management platforms like AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi, and Rentec Direct. Many modern property management software platforms for Sacramento landlords include rent reporting as a native feature.
Whichever vendor you choose, verify three things before you sign up:
- The service reports to at least one of the three major bureaus
- It complies with Fair Credit Reporting Act data furnisher standards
- It provides tenant-facing opt-in and opt-out workflows that match AB 2747 language
The $10 Fee Cap and Who Pays
AB 2747 caps any fee passed to the tenant at the lesser of actual cost or $10 per month. The fee structure matters because it is a common compliance trap.
Three Ways Landlords Handle the Cost
Option 1: Landlord absorbs the cost. The landlord pays the rent reporting vendor (typically $2 to $10 per unit per month) and passes no fee to the tenant. This is the simplest approach and increases tenant goodwill -- a useful retention tool covered in our tenant retention strategies guide.
Option 2: Landlord passes actual cost to the tenant, up to $10. If the vendor charges the landlord $6 per unit per month, the landlord may bill the tenant up to $6 -- not $10. The cap is actual cost or $10, whichever is lower.
Option 3: Tenant pays the vendor directly. Some rent reporting services let tenants subscribe and pay directly, reporting retroactively once they have the landlord's verification. In this setup the landlord's obligation is to verify rent payment accuracy when asked.
What You Cannot Do
- Charge more than $10 per month -- ever
- Charge more than your actual per-unit cost
- Bundle the fee into rent without itemizing it
- Charge a fee to tenants who did not opt in
- Continue charging a fee after a tenant opts out
Overcharging on AB 2747 fees is a fast route to a statutory violation claim. Keep the accounting clean and itemized -- our rental property bookkeeping guide shows the ledger setup.
Positive-Only Reporting: Why Late Payments Are Excluded
AB 2747 is called "positive rent reporting" for a reason. The law allows reporting of on-time rent payments only. Late payments, partial payments, evictions, and lease violations are not reportable to credit bureaus under this statute.
This is a significant policy choice. Existing consumer reporting law allows negative data reporting under certain circumstances, but AB 2747 creates a one-way credit-building channel. Tenants who opt in get credit for paying on time. They do not get dinged for paying late.
Separate from AB 2747, a landlord may still report unpaid rent balances to collections agencies after lease termination under the normal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act framework -- but that is a different legal channel from the positive rent reporting required by Section 1954.07.
Tenant Opt-In and Opt-Out Mechanics
AB 2747 gives tenants complete control. They can opt in, opt out, and opt back in at any time during the tenancy. The landlord's role is to accept those elections and execute them inside the statutory windows.
Opt-In Process
- Tenant reviews the written offer the landlord provides at lease signing or annually
- Tenant signs and returns the opt-in election form
- Landlord enrolls the tenant with the chosen consumer reporting agency or vendor
- Landlord begins reporting on-time payments with the next monthly payment cycle
- Landlord may begin charging the agreed monthly fee (capped at actual cost or $10)
Opt-Out Process
- Tenant submits a written opt-out request to the landlord
- Landlord must stop reporting within 15 days of receiving the request
- Landlord must stop charging the fee immediately -- or refund any amount already charged for the post-opt-out period
- Landlord notifies the reporting vendor to terminate the reporting
- Landlord documents the opt-out date and retains the record for at least 3 years
The 15-day opt-out window is a hard deadline. A tenant who opts out on the 1st of the month and is still being reported on the 20th has a statutory violation claim.
Recordkeeping Requirements
AB 2747 requires landlords to maintain records related to rent reporting for at least three years. At a minimum, every landlord subject to the law should retain:
- Copies of written offers delivered at lease signing and annually
- Signed opt-in election forms for each participating tenant
- Written opt-out requests and the date reporting stopped
- Monthly reporting logs showing which tenants were reported and the payment data submitted
- Fee ledger entries showing the amount charged to each tenant each month and the per-unit cost basis
- Vendor contracts and invoices showing the rent reporting service being used
Pro Tip: Store AB 2747 records inside the tenant file alongside the signed lease, move-in inspection, and security deposit receipt. When the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation or a tenant's attorney requests documentation, having everything in one place saves hours and avoids "missing record" defenses that typically fail.
Penalties for Non-Compliance
AB 2747 creates both a private right of action for tenants and potential civil enforcement by the Attorney General and local prosecutors. Civil Code 1954.07 does not set a single per-violation dollar figure, but the typical exposure categories for landlords include:
- Actual damages -- loss the tenant can prove, such as overcharged fees or credit-building opportunities missed
- Statutory damages -- available under parallel California consumer protection statutes
- Attorney's fees and costs -- which typically dwarf the underlying damages in small-dollar disputes
- Injunctive relief -- a court order requiring the landlord to comply going forward
- Unfair Business Practices claims under Business and Professions Code Section 17200, which can trigger restitution to similarly situated tenants
The real exposure is not a single missed offer. It is the pattern. A landlord with 50 tenants who never offered rent reporting to any of them has 50 potential claimants and a clean class action theory. The cure is cheap (offer the program, document the offer) -- the non-compliance is expensive.
AB 2747 vs AB 2493: Two Different Laws, Often Confused
Landlords routinely conflate AB 2747 (positive rent reporting) with AB 2493 (tenant screening fee reform). Both passed in the 2024 legislative session, both amended sections of the Civil Code affecting landlords, and both took effect in 2025. But they regulate completely different parts of the landlord-tenant relationship.
The short version: AB 2493 controls what you charge applicants before they move in. AB 2747 controls what you report to credit bureaus after they move in. Our companion AB 2493 screening fee compliance guide covers the application-stage rules in detail.
How AB 2747 Interacts With Other California Landlord Laws
Positive rent reporting does not operate in isolation. A few overlapping statutes are worth flagging for Roseville and Sacramento landlords running compliant portfolios.
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
Once you furnish data to a consumer reporting agency, you become a "data furnisher" under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act. That carries independent obligations: accuracy, dispute handling, and notice rules. Most landlords satisfy FCRA duties automatically by using a third-party rent reporting vendor that acts as the data furnisher -- but the landlord is still responsible for giving the vendor accurate payment data.
Source of Income Protections (SB 329)
Section 8 voucher holders are a protected class in California. If you offer positive rent reporting to market-rate tenants, you must offer it to voucher holders on the same terms. Treating them differently is a Fair Employment and Housing Act violation -- covered in our California fair housing laws guide.
AB 1482 Statewide Rent Cap
AB 2747 does not change anything about rent amounts, caps, or increases. Your AB 1482 rent increase obligations operate on a parallel track.
AB 12 Security Deposit Limit
Some landlords have asked whether the AB 2747 monthly fee counts toward the AB 12 security deposit cap of one month's rent. It does not -- rent reporting fees are a monthly service fee under Section 1954.07, not a refundable deposit. Our California security deposit laws guide covers the deposit rules separately.
Implementation Checklist for Roseville and Sacramento Landlords
Use this checklist to verify AB 2747 compliance for each rental unit in your California portfolio. Every item maps to a specific requirement of Civil Code 1954.07.
- Count your California units across all properties and ownership entities. If the total is 15 or more, you are subject to AB 2747.
- Select a compliant rent reporting vendor that reports to at least one of the major bureaus.
- Draft your written offer template with all seven required elements (bureau identity, fee, positive-only, opt-in/out rights, 15-day opt-out window, procedures).
- Integrate the offer into your lease package as a standalone addendum signed at lease commencement.
- Calendar the annual offer for every existing tenant who previously declined or never responded.
- Set up a fee ledger to track actual per-unit cost and ensure you never charge a tenant more than the lesser of cost or $10.
- Create an opt-out workflow that triggers vendor termination and fee cessation within 15 days.
- Train your leasing and accounting staff on the offer script, opt-in paperwork, and opt-out response time.
- Document every step -- offer delivery, opt-in elections, opt-out requests, monthly reporting, fee billing.
- Retain records for a minimum of 3 years, ideally inside the tenant file alongside the lease.
Local Context: Why AB 2747 Hits Roseville, Rocklin, and Sacramento Portfolios Hard
The 15-unit threshold is calibrated to large-operator compliance, but Northern California's scattered-site rental market means many small and mid-size landlords in Placer and Sacramento Counties clear the threshold without realizing it. A landlord with a handful of single-family homes in Roseville, a couple of duplexes in Rocklin, and a small fourplex in Sacramento can easily reach 15 units spread across multiple cities.
Per the Roseville rental market report, the typical Placer County landlord in Lifetime Property Management's book of business holds between 6 and 22 units across 3 to 8 properties. That profile puts a material share of Roseville-area owners directly inside AB 2747's coverage zone. The implementation burden -- written offers, opt-in tracking, monthly reporting, fee accounting -- is exactly the kind of paperwork load that tips owners toward professional management, particularly when paired with AB 2493 screening reform and AB 1482 rent cap obligations stacking on the same portfolio.
Why Property Managers Handle This Better
Professional property managers build AB 2747 compliance directly into the leasing and rent collection workflow. Every new lease at Lifetime Property Management ships with the positive rent reporting addendum. Every rent-roll batch run each month includes the on-time payment feed to the reporting vendor. Every opt-out request routes to the accounting team with a 15-day service level. Owners weighing self-management against professional management should count AB 2747 as one more reason the compliance math has tilted toward hiring a manager over the past three years.
Frequently Asked Questions
When did California AB 2747 take effect?
AB 2747 took effect on April 1, 2025. The bill was signed by Governor Newsom on September 25, 2024, and codified as Civil Code Section 1954.07 with a delayed operative date to give landlords time to set up compliant reporting workflows.
Which landlords have to offer positive rent reporting under AB 2747?
Landlords who own 15 or more residential rental units in California, counted across all properties and ownership entities statewide. The threshold is portfolio-wide, not per building. A landlord with 8 single-family rentals and 7 units spread across duplexes and condos is subject to the law because the total is 15.
Can landlords charge tenants a fee for rent reporting under AB 2747?
Yes, but capped at the lesser of actual cost or $10 per month. If the landlord's cost per unit is $6, the maximum tenant charge is $6 -- not $10. The $10 figure is a ceiling, not a default. Fees must be itemized separately from rent and cannot continue after a tenant opts out.
Are late rent payments reported to credit bureaus under AB 2747?
No. AB 2747 authorizes reporting of on-time rent payments only. Late payments, partial payments, and lease violations are not reportable under this statute. A landlord may still pursue unpaid rent through collections channels under separate debt collection law, but that is a different process from AB 2747 rent reporting.
What is the difference between AB 2747 and AB 2493?
AB 2747 governs positive rent reporting during tenancy and applies to landlords with 15+ units. AB 2493 governs tenant screening fees at the application stage and applies to all California landlords. They regulate different parts of the landlord-tenant relationship, both took effect in 2025, and compliance with one does not satisfy the other.
How quickly must a landlord stop reporting after a tenant opts out?
Within 15 days of receiving the opt-out request. The landlord must notify the reporting vendor, stop the monthly data feed, and cease charging any fee for the post-opt-out period. Refunds are required for any fee already billed after the opt-out effective date.
Do single-family home rentals fall under AB 2747?
Yes, if the owner's total California residential rental unit count is 15 or more. A single-family rental counted alone does not trigger the law, but single-family homes count toward the 15-unit threshold when aggregated with the rest of the owner's portfolio. An owner of 15 single-family rentals across Placer and Sacramento Counties is fully subject to AB 2747.
What happens if a landlord ignores AB 2747?
Tenants have a private right of action for violations, and the law is enforceable through California's unfair business practice statute (Business & Professions Code 17200). Exposure includes actual damages, statutory damages under parallel consumer protection laws, attorney's fees, injunctive relief, and potential class-wide restitution if the non-compliance is systemic across the owner's portfolio.
The Bottom Line for Roseville and Sacramento Landlords
AB 2747 is not a heavy lift in isolation -- a written addendum, a vendor relationship, and a clean monthly workflow cover 95% of it. The risk comes from ignoring the law or miscounting the 15-unit threshold. California's 2025 landlord compliance stack (AB 1482, AB 12, AB 2493, AB 2747, and the SB 567 just-cause framework) is cumulative, and owners who get one layer wrong typically have the others out of order too.
For landlords across Roseville, Rocklin, Lincoln, Folsom, and greater Sacramento, the path forward is to audit your portfolio unit count, pick a rent reporting vendor, build the offer into your lease pipeline, and document every opt-in and opt-out. For owners who would rather hand the compliance workflow to a manager already running it at scale, that is exactly what Lifetime Property Management does.
Need help getting AB 2747 compliance in place for your California rentals? Contact Lifetime Property Management for a free portfolio review. We manage 50+ doors across Placer and Sacramento Counties and handle positive rent reporting, screening fee compliance, AB 1482 tracking, and every other California landlord obligation inside one workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
When did California AB 2747 take effect?
AB 2747 took effect on April 1, 2025. Governor Newsom signed the bill on September 25, 2024, adding Civil Code Section 1954.07 with a delayed operative date to give landlords time to implement compliant positive rent reporting workflows.
Which landlords have to offer positive rent reporting under AB 2747?
Landlords who own 15 or more residential rental units in California, counted across all properties and ownership entities statewide. The threshold is portfolio-wide, not per building. A Roseville landlord with 8 single-family rentals plus 7 condo and duplex units in Sacramento is subject to AB 2747 because the total reaches 15.
Can landlords charge tenants a fee for rent reporting under AB 2747?
Yes, but the fee is capped at the lesser of actual cost or $10 per month. If the landlord's vendor cost per unit is $6, the maximum tenant charge is $6. The $10 figure is a ceiling, not a default. Fees must be itemized separately from rent and must stop immediately when a tenant opts out.
Are late rent payments reported to credit bureaus under AB 2747?
No. AB 2747 authorizes reporting of on-time rent payments only. Late payments, partial payments, and lease violations are not reportable under this statute. Landlords may still pursue unpaid rent through standard debt collection channels, but that is a separate legal process from positive rent reporting under Civil Code 1954.07.
What is the difference between AB 2747 and AB 2493?
AB 2747 governs positive rent reporting during tenancy and applies only to landlords with 15+ California units. AB 2493 governs tenant screening fees at the application stage and applies to all California landlords regardless of portfolio size. They regulate different parts of the landlord-tenant relationship, and compliance with one does not satisfy the other.
How quickly must a landlord stop reporting after a tenant opts out?
Within 15 days of receiving the opt-out request. The landlord must notify the reporting vendor, stop the monthly data feed, and cease charging any fee for the post-opt-out period. Any fee already billed for time after the opt-out effective date must be refunded.
Do single-family home rentals fall under AB 2747?
Yes, if the owner's total California residential rental unit count is 15 or more. A single-family rental by itself does not trigger the law, but single-family homes count toward the 15-unit threshold when combined with the rest of the portfolio. An investor with 15 single-family rentals across Placer and Sacramento Counties is fully subject to AB 2747.
What happens if a landlord ignores AB 2747?
Tenants have a private right of action for violations, and enforcement is available through California's unfair business practice statute. Exposure includes actual damages, statutory damages, attorney's fees, injunctive relief, and potential class-wide restitution if non-compliance is systemic across the owner's portfolio. A pattern of missed offers across 50 tenants can scale quickly into a class action claim.
Ready for Stress-Free Property Management?
Get a free rental analysis and see how much your property could earn.